The thought of Diane and Sloane together, both of them touching me, competing for my attention instead of tearing each other apart over me. The fantasy had a sick appeal that made me hate myself even as my body responded to the mental image.
I was exactly the kind of scumbag the System thought I was.
"Fine," I said quietly. "Tell me what to do."
〘 First stage: Allow subjects time to process initial shock. Minimum recommended cooling period is thirty minutes. Use this time to prepare approach strategy. Host should review each subject’s attachment vectors and identify optimal persuasion angles. 〙
I sat back down and opened the Oracle Feed fully, pulling up the detailed profiles on both Diane and Sloane. The information scrolled past my eyes, clinical and comprehensive.
Sloane Fitzgerald - Key Attachment Vectors:
Primary Driver: Years of suppressed romantic feelings now validated through physical intimacy. Subject experienced first sexual encounter with Host, creating powerful bonding through vulnerability and trust.
Secondary Driver: Competitive nature. Subject values winning and success. Discovery of Diane as rival triggers territorial instinct.
Tertiary Driver: Fear of abandonment. Both biological parents remain present but Subject experienced Host’s arrival as threat to maternal attention before transforming into attachment object.
Vulnerability Point: Subject values fairness and hates losing but responds positively to situations where she can win while helping others win simultaneously. Reframing of current situation from zero-sum competition to mutual benefit exploits this psychological pattern.
I read that last part twice. Sloane hated losing, but she liked it when everyone won. If I could make her see this as a situation where nobody lost, where she got to keep me and her relationship with her mom stayed intact...
It was manipulative as hell. It was also probably the only angle that would work.
Diane Fitzgerald - Key Attachment Vectors:
Primary Driver: Maternal instinct (complex). Subject views Host as both ward/son figure and sexual partner. These competing frameworks create cognitive dissonance that Subject resolves through compartmentalization. Violation of compartmentalization (Sloane’s discovery) triggers guilt response.
Secondary Driver: Professional investment. Subject has spent years grooming Host’s public image and career prospects. Host’s success reflects Subject’s judgment and capabilities.
Tertiary Driver: Sexual satisfaction and emotional fulfillment. Subject’s adult relationships have been primarily transactional and professional. Host provides genuine intimacy Subject has not experienced in years.
Vulnerability Point: Subject’s guilt regarding Sloane is surface-level emotion masking deeper fear of losing access to Host. Subject will rationalize almost any arrangement that preserves her relationship with both Host and daughter. Providing rationalization framework that allows Subject to maintain self-image while continuing affair is optimal approach.
So Diane felt guilty about hurting Sloane but didn’t actually want to stop sleeping with me. She just needed an excuse that let her keep doing it without feeling like a terrible mother.
And I was supposed to provide that excuse.
I stood up again and walked to my window, looking out at the Creston Hills neighborhood. The sun had almost set. The houses glowed with warm light. Normal families doing normal things.
Not whatever the hell this was.
My phone buzzed on the nightstand. I picked it up and saw a message from Felicity, the girl from the exam.
Felicity: Hey! Just wanted to check in. You were amazing btw totally getting in
I stared at the message, my finger hovering over the keyboard. Another girl. Another potential complication. The System probably had plans for her too.
I put the phone down without responding.
One crisis at a time.
The Oracle Feed updated with a notification.
〘 Cooling period complete. Recommended approach: initiate conversation with Subject Diane first. Subject is currently in her bedroom, alone. Subject Sloane remains in her room with door locked. Diane conversation establishes framework. Sloane conversation requires more delicate approach. 〙
"And if Diane tells me to fuck off?"
〘 Probability of negative response: 18.3%. Subject Diane is pragmatic and solutions-oriented. Subject will be receptive to proposal if presented correctly. 〙



VERIFYCAPTCHA_LABEL
Comments
The readers' comments on the novel: The Scumbag's Guide To Heroism